<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: how to improve Windows Vista performance &#8211; top 10 methods</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.webstuffscan.com/2007/09/28/how-to-improve-windows-vista-performance-top-10-methods/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.webstuffscan.com/2007/09/28/how-to-improve-windows-vista-performance-top-10-methods/</link>
	<description>Scanning the Web for the good stuff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 12:16:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: kmd</title>
		<link>http://www.webstuffscan.com/2007/09/28/how-to-improve-windows-vista-performance-top-10-methods/comment-page-1/#comment-26008</link>
		<dc:creator>kmd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2008 12:35:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webstuffscan.com/2007/09/28/how-to-improve-windows-vista-performance-top-10-methods/#comment-26008</guid>
		<description>Muppet: If these people who are &#039;naive about how dangerous downloads and attachements are&#039;, then I hardly think there are going to click &#039;don&#039;t allow&#039; when a malicious program wants to run. Programs on Windows computers use names that any &#039;naive&#039; person is not going to understand so they are just going to click &#039;allow&#039; to all programs they are asked to allow, hence defeating the purpose of UAC.

Please check your facts before making blind comments such as this.

JM: Mac OS might have a similar feature to UAC, but I have used Mac OS X for a while, along with Windows, and Mac OS by far has littler questions than Windows. It pretty much only asks questions when they are needed, and it would only ask the question once (ie. not through three or four questions when installing one program.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Muppet: If these people who are &#8216;naive about how dangerous downloads and attachements are&#8217;, then I hardly think there are going to click &#8216;don&#8217;t allow&#8217; when a malicious program wants to run. Programs on Windows computers use names that any &#8216;naive&#8217; person is not going to understand so they are just going to click &#8216;allow&#8217; to all programs they are asked to allow, hence defeating the purpose of UAC.</p>
<p>Please check your facts before making blind comments such as this.</p>
<p>JM: Mac OS might have a similar feature to UAC, but I have used Mac OS X for a while, along with Windows, and Mac OS by far has littler questions than Windows. It pretty much only asks questions when they are needed, and it would only ask the question once (ie. not through three or four questions when installing one program.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Muppet</title>
		<link>http://www.webstuffscan.com/2007/09/28/how-to-improve-windows-vista-performance-top-10-methods/comment-page-1/#comment-25961</link>
		<dc:creator>Muppet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 04:06:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webstuffscan.com/2007/09/28/how-to-improve-windows-vista-performance-top-10-methods/#comment-25961</guid>
		<description>@Sikk:  Firstly, there are people out there who are just like those who you say should not have a PC.  They are naive about just how dangerous downloads and attachments are, and therefore run them with impunity.  Windows was created so that everyone, smart or stupid, could use a computer.

Windows Defender isn&#039;t a firewall, it&#039;s a spyware scanner.  Disabling it has no effect on the firewall.

Please check your facts before making blind comments such as this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Sikk:  Firstly, there are people out there who are just like those who you say should not have a PC.  They are naive about just how dangerous downloads and attachments are, and therefore run them with impunity.  Windows was created so that everyone, smart or stupid, could use a computer.</p>
<p>Windows Defender isn&#8217;t a firewall, it&#8217;s a spyware scanner.  Disabling it has no effect on the firewall.</p>
<p>Please check your facts before making blind comments such as this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy</title>
		<link>http://www.webstuffscan.com/2007/09/28/how-to-improve-windows-vista-performance-top-10-methods/comment-page-1/#comment-25921</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 21:16:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webstuffscan.com/2007/09/28/how-to-improve-windows-vista-performance-top-10-methods/#comment-25921</guid>
		<description>someone asked why use vista if you tone down the visualizations to xp/98.  Simply put: directx 10 only works on vista.  it&#039;s just unfortunate that vista performs so poorly when it comes to graphical display.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>someone asked why use vista if you tone down the visualizations to xp/98.  Simply put: directx 10 only works on vista.  it&#8217;s just unfortunate that vista performs so poorly when it comes to graphical display.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sikk</title>
		<link>http://www.webstuffscan.com/2007/09/28/how-to-improve-windows-vista-performance-top-10-methods/comment-page-1/#comment-25832</link>
		<dc:creator>Sikk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 20:43:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webstuffscan.com/2007/09/28/how-to-improve-windows-vista-performance-top-10-methods/#comment-25832</guid>
		<description>If UAC is the only thing stopping you from loading your computer up with malware then you shouldn&#039;t own a pc. The access controls where meant to help administrators maintain control of their PC&#039;s in a network and idiots protects their RN&#039;s and laptops in an increasingly wireless world. Lauding on him for this advice is asinine. I personally found the article to be very intuitive for a user not a tech to have written it.

The only folly I would point out is the windows defender point, you need a firewall on your computer, period. Yes I would recommend using one other than windows defender, but make sure it is a good one (zone alarm is my preference, their newest suite is astounding). BUT, there aren&#039;t many other choices out there for people running 64 bit Vista or XP. So make sure your are on a platform with better options before you go bulling your pants and bending over in a subway restroom while blindfolded.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If UAC is the only thing stopping you from loading your computer up with malware then you shouldn&#8217;t own a pc. The access controls where meant to help administrators maintain control of their PC&#8217;s in a network and idiots protects their RN&#8217;s and laptops in an increasingly wireless world. Lauding on him for this advice is asinine. I personally found the article to be very intuitive for a user not a tech to have written it.</p>
<p>The only folly I would point out is the windows defender point, you need a firewall on your computer, period. Yes I would recommend using one other than windows defender, but make sure it is a good one (zone alarm is my preference, their newest suite is astounding). BUT, there aren&#8217;t many other choices out there for people running 64 bit Vista or XP. So make sure your are on a platform with better options before you go bulling your pants and bending over in a subway restroom while blindfolded.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://www.webstuffscan.com/2007/09/28/how-to-improve-windows-vista-performance-top-10-methods/comment-page-1/#comment-25777</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 03:20:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webstuffscan.com/2007/09/28/how-to-improve-windows-vista-performance-top-10-methods/#comment-25777</guid>
		<description>You are wrong about the ReadyBoost. This feature augments the read/write cache memory built into hard drives. This is completely different from RAM. So Vista will use Readyboost to cache data onto the usb or sd card - making the initial load time of say i tunes or photoshop elements slow, but all further load times of the application (as long as machine isn&#039;t rebooted) much faster.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are wrong about the ReadyBoost. This feature augments the read/write cache memory built into hard drives. This is completely different from RAM. So Vista will use Readyboost to cache data onto the usb or sd card &#8211; making the initial load time of say i tunes or photoshop elements slow, but all further load times of the application (as long as machine isn&#8217;t rebooted) much faster.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JM</title>
		<link>http://www.webstuffscan.com/2007/09/28/how-to-improve-windows-vista-performance-top-10-methods/comment-page-1/#comment-25768</link>
		<dc:creator>JM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 06:44:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webstuffscan.com/2007/09/28/how-to-improve-windows-vista-performance-top-10-methods/#comment-25768</guid>
		<description>Point3:  Disable UAC.   I&#039;d really question this advice.  

Sure, when you personally change something on your system - of course you&#039;re asking it to happen.   The problem is that the operating system doesn&#039;t distinguish between you and some software pretending to be you.  So when &quot;Mr Malware&quot; comes along and starts making changes, you&#039;ll never know about it (if you turn off UAC).  

You might turn around and say that &quot;I only want my computer to do directly as I ask&quot; ... but I think most of us would be taken aback by how much functionality we&#039;d lose (things that go on in the background automatically, using your credentials).

I doubt very much that it would be the first thing that power-users would disable - they should have a better appreciation of it&#039;s impact on the security of their system.  To recommend to your readers to open themselves up to potential security threats, is poor advice IMHO.

Microsoft get rapped for being the bane of all evil, but in fairness, the latest Mac OS does exactly the same and we never hear complaints about this.

----------

Other advise about removing the heaps of junk that get put onto computers (new and old) is sound though.  This can make a major difference.

----------

In response to &quot;ajay&quot; (above) - I completely agree with his sentiment.  However, part of the problem is that manufacturers now ship vista almost as defacto, even on computers that don&#039;t quite cut it.  For example, I own a marvellously tiny Sony Vaio vgn-ux  ... that ships with vista. Problem is thtat it&#039;s not really man enough for the job of running aero-effects.  It does work with them, but I&#039;d rather have a more responsive machine - hence they&#039;re turned off.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Point3:  Disable UAC.   I&#8217;d really question this advice.  </p>
<p>Sure, when you personally change something on your system &#8211; of course you&#8217;re asking it to happen.   The problem is that the operating system doesn&#8217;t distinguish between you and some software pretending to be you.  So when &#8220;Mr Malware&#8221; comes along and starts making changes, you&#8217;ll never know about it (if you turn off UAC).  </p>
<p>You might turn around and say that &#8220;I only want my computer to do directly as I ask&#8221; &#8230; but I think most of us would be taken aback by how much functionality we&#8217;d lose (things that go on in the background automatically, using your credentials).</p>
<p>I doubt very much that it would be the first thing that power-users would disable &#8211; they should have a better appreciation of it&#8217;s impact on the security of their system.  To recommend to your readers to open themselves up to potential security threats, is poor advice IMHO.</p>
<p>Microsoft get rapped for being the bane of all evil, but in fairness, the latest Mac OS does exactly the same and we never hear complaints about this.</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-</p>
<p>Other advise about removing the heaps of junk that get put onto computers (new and old) is sound though.  This can make a major difference.</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-</p>
<p>In response to &#8220;ajay&#8221; (above) &#8211; I completely agree with his sentiment.  However, part of the problem is that manufacturers now ship vista almost as defacto, even on computers that don&#8217;t quite cut it.  For example, I own a marvellously tiny Sony Vaio vgn-ux  &#8230; that ships with vista. Problem is thtat it&#8217;s not really man enough for the job of running aero-effects.  It does work with them, but I&#8217;d rather have a more responsive machine &#8211; hence they&#8217;re turned off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ajay</title>
		<link>http://www.webstuffscan.com/2007/09/28/how-to-improve-windows-vista-performance-top-10-methods/comment-page-1/#comment-25688</link>
		<dc:creator>Ajay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 05:59:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webstuffscan.com/2007/09/28/how-to-improve-windows-vista-performance-top-10-methods/#comment-25688</guid>
		<description>Point 5. Reduce graphics and other UI features 

If u disable this feature then better use Windwos XP or even window 98. Why to switch to Vista????????????</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Point 5. Reduce graphics and other UI features </p>
<p>If u disable this feature then better use Windwos XP or even window 98. Why to switch to Vista????????????</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 1.709 seconds -->
